You are here

Backhaul or no Backhaul?

8 posts / 0 new
Last post
KD7BKO's picture
Backhaul or no Backhaul?

Hello all,
I am with the K7MSH Utah Amature Radio Mesh club in Central Utah.  We currently have 3 mountaintop nodes with M2 Rocket/Sectors at each site.  The only thing linking them are users in the valley that can see at least 2 of the mountaintop nodes.  The question I have is if it's conducive to have them linked with 3 or 5 ghz.  My understanding is that by isolating the two mountains with another band will help with the hidden node and packet collision/retry issues. 
Does anyone have any information to why it would or would not matter to separate them by linking with another band? 

k1ky's picture

I would think that ths point is to provide a system to serve your users, so Backhaul - Yes! I have 6+ Major relay sites in our system here in the Nashville and surrounding area, all linked with 5 Ghz backhauls. 36 miles is our longest link so far.  We also work with the group in Anchorage AK and they are using 3 Ghz links successfully.

kg9dw's picture
Most definitely do a backhaul

Most definitely do a backhaul to the "islands". I use 5GHz for my three islands, and I provide at least one clear channel between the backhaul and anything else at the site (like a backhaul to another island). Ideally you'd have two ways in and out of each site, so a backhaul northbound and a backhaul southbound for instance.

I use AREDN for my backhauls, but some guys will use airOS. There are a couple of threads on the forum discussing the pros and for backhaul.

I will third the backhaul.

I will third the backhaul.

Assuming everything else is the same (links are equal quality, equal amounts of competing stations etc) you can double the network speed with a seperate band hop (just like in the old packet days, a a node that has to transmit on the same frequency it receives on has 50% speed)

In reality you probably won't have these equal conditions and being able to pull off to a seperate band means that in addition you also get chances for less competition to the frequency, possibly tighter controlled distance parameter settings (which impacts speed) , ideally higher SNR (because of the ability to use directed aimed antennas), and the list goes on.

Ideally you will still have connections at the lower levels or backhaul levels for redundancy, these links will usually not be the greatest but can still be auxiliary paths.

Obvious question

Has a path link profile been completed? I also see two of them from AD7QF-QTH2, alibet with poor links, seeing them on a side node. Antelope has a 3 and 5 gHz node, with the 5 aimed south.  With my clear path to Nelson and Lake Mountian, I could point my QTH3 south.or set up a 5. 

But the comment is, check for a clear path between the mountain top nodes.

KD7BKO's picture
Path link

The question was related to throughput with using 5ghz(or 3ghz) backhauls to our 2.4ghz mountaintop nodes.  West mountain and lake mountain cannot directly see eachother.  As of right now my node (KD7BKO PGFOOTHILLS) is the only thing linking the two mountaintops.  We plan on replacing that with two 5ghz Nanobridges to each mountaintop, and getting rid of the M2Rocket/sector.  The question is.... is it worth it to change out the M2 rocket for two 5ghz links?  I have a M5Rocket that I plan on using to connect to the layton area  I have spent alot on mesh equipment, so a rocket dish may have to wait till spring.;-)

KD7BKO's picture

The way I see it, using one channel would be like trying to use a simplex repeater vs a duplex repeater.  I dont know how many of you have ever used a simplex repeater, where it records 30 seconds and repeats your message you back, but I assume thats kinda what its like.  It you use a duplex repeater, it picks it up on one band, and spits it out the other band side.   Hence why it would take 50% of the bandwidth. 

Correct, including the fact

Correct, including the fact that backoff timers are used as well for collisions.

I was in charge of a full duplex packet repeater here for a while, and most people never heard of such a think so glad to hear someone else who knows of it (though ours was a standard 2m with 600kHz split :)

While the implementation is very different for mesh,  a lot of the old packet knowledge (in my mind at least) holds true on mesh.  I'll often analogy to packet like this to make it easier to explain to people.

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer